University presidents love to say that their institutional values are clear. It is a comforting claim, and an increasingly hollow one.
The pattern has become familiar. A university adopts a policy that touches on expression. Faculty or students object, arguing it chills speech or signals exclusion. Administrators insist the policy is content-neutral and procedural. Critics point out that no policy lands in a vacuum. The administration expresses concern, perhaps apologizes, and promises dialogue. A committee may be formed. The underlying tension goes unresolved.
Continue reading “The Comfortable Fiction of Campus Neutrality”
